Talk:Khattar (surname)

(greetings)

i m sardar faheem from pindsaral attock i also belong to tribe of khattar

Vandal edit by ip 119.153.68.44

This anonymous ip has deliberately corrupted referenced content on 16th March 2009
Intothefire (talk) 17:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I m Sardar Azhar Abbas Khan from Thatta. thank you so much Sardar Saab for beautifull writeup.....

Dear I am also Khattar and from Bahtar .. I dont think so sardar sikandar hayaat khan's history is write able for khattars .. !!! what he done !!! Right hand for British people??? why he rewded as the name Sir"?? anyone know ?? Sardar Kala khan was the freedom fighter ... and he tried to kill Nikalson (wasiraye hind) at margala hill near taxila .. sardar sikandar hayat help him so that the British Trrorist rewaded Sardar sikandar the name SIR " where is our real hero name ?? SARDAR KALA KHAN the freedom fighter ?????????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khattar229 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Vandal Edit

87.88.167.220 has vandal edited cited content on 30 May 2010 .
Intothefire (talk)

Vandal Edit

217.42.182.130 has corrupted cited content on 20th November 2009]
Intothefire (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Vandal Edits

119.153.68.44

217.42.182.130

142.157.218.17

87.88.167.220 bogus citations

87.88.167.220 bogus citations
Intothefire (talk) 06:06, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Referenced content repeatedly vandled from this article

“ The Khattars are generally credited with a Hindu origin,from Khatris but they are divided in belief as to their descent .Some admit Hindu origin , while those who deny it claim an Arab descent , alleging they are closely connected with Awans . ”

“ Inorder to meet the generally accepted belief that they were originally Hindus , even those who claim a Mussalman origin admit that while at Bagh Nilab they became Hindus and were reconverted . ”

“ Khattar wedding rites used to closely resemble those of Hindus , Brahmans even being present , but they are now solmnised according to strict Muhammadan rules . ”

Intothefire (talk) 05:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Request for Edit Semi-Protectected

Dear Editors, I am requesting semi-protection for this article as in my experience, at various times people (prob belonging to some of the prominent families of this tribe) keep on adding various 'vanity' items to it and changing it, by inserting either unverifiable data or long lists and family trees. Thanks Khani100 (talk) 06:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

If it continues to be a problem, I suggest you either contact an Admin directly, or bring up the issue on the Dicussion tabs at WP:WikiProject India, WP:WikiProject Pakistan, or ideally both. In the meantime, thanks for your good work maintaining the article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear MatthewVanitas, thank you for your kind support; am sorry for not being able to contact/respond earlier. I think it might indeed be necessary to bring up the issue at WP:WikiProject India and WP:WikiProject Pakistan, both, as some people are again adding unsubstantiated and self-promoting material and only today I found a whole section on 'Khattars in Afghanistan' which I have now removed. If worst comes to worst (and I would like if we could develop a good article via a sensible attitude rather than some sort of inflated 'tribalism') then Admin will unfortunately have to be contacted. Its v tiresome, am sorry to say, to try to sort out and organise and edit an article and come back and find that its suffered negative attentions-- again. This seems to be most common w ref to articles concerning Pakistani tribes/clans, for the simple reason that people from these read something that they dont like/agree with even though its verifiable fact, and then want to add their own version/s-- which wouldnt be bad actually if (a) this/these were properly verifiable/substantiated and (b) if they were written with some basic semblance of order and attention to writing and grammar etc. Unfortunately, by now this article (for example) is in rather a jumble and will take me indefintely long to give it form and shape again, to the detriment of other articles. Khani100 (talk) 10:32, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Khani100

To request protection of this page you need to make a post at WP:RFPP, the template you used is for requesting edits to already protected pages--Jac16888 ^Talk 12:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Dear User:Jac1688, thank you! I just realised this and have made an appropriate request. Thank you, Khani100 (talk) 12:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Khani100

Dispute

Dear Brother Selam! i am a Pushtun/khattar and my family is living in the Northern Afghanistan since Centuries ! Its not just my family but a Tribe of khattar's is spread over the northern border of Afghanistan and many other places within the Afghan region. Therefore the changes made last time were by me, as i read this biography of Khattar's. i dont have any books from which i can refer what i wrote but all the data that i had provided was a fact and has been delivered to me; by my ancestors via my Parents. We've been taught all our life that a bulk of Khattar's from the tribe; Several centuries back left Afghanistan to fight the Hindo's in the subcontinent(today Pakistan) and that's how it was edited. I hope u accept the changes! thankyou I hope You dont deny the Fact that a large number of Khattar's still reside in the European regions where they moved first and many still reside in the Khorasan Region!

07/12/2011 Selamwaleykum brother ! many thanks for the reply. i would like to refer the the first paragraph from the "Origins", "one is they are Non-Fatimid Arabs, descended from Ali, cousin and son-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, and thus an Arab tribe that entered in Spain with Tariq Bin Ziyad. The supposed head of the tribe, Abu Al-Khataar was supposedly a popular governor of al-Andalusia, Spain. After the downfall of the Moorish government in Spain, the tribe claims to have left it and moved to Turkey, ("Iran, Afghanistan"), India and north west of Pakistan. "

As far as the history of the tribe discussed among the elders of Khattar's in The Afghan region, it is claimed that the Khatatrs came from Arab to Spain and after the downfall of the empire they moved to turkey and Afghanistan/Iran and Then later They had move to North-West of Pakistan i.e. a vast number of Khattar's settled in Pakistan after a war. in the first Paragraph of the "origins" it is similar to what i know and people here. well as u have quoted Nawab Sahib From British India; they have had moved from Afghanistan towards later so called British India(first it wasn't British-India). and yes my Brother for Your Information Khattar's Still are in Afghanistan And Always will Insha'Allah!

Objection to this History was just that it only discusses Khattar's in India and Pakistan whilst many still living in the regions They Came from to these areas. as the first Line says:

this clearly deny's the fact that Khattar's are no where else but only In the panjab of Pakistan and India while their roots are Forgotten.

"Nationalism" is not allowed in Islam brother but it brings differences in the Humanity. but the History of one's self should be well-known. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.83.1.244 (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Khattars in Afghanistan

Dear unknown brother, many salams to you too! Let me please quote from Priestley's translation of Nawab Muhammad Hayat Khan's "Hayat i Afghan" (orig. 1865, trans. 1874 in Eng, pp.V-VI of the Author's original Persian preface)for your edification, as Nawab Sahib (d.1901) was one of the elders/chiefs of the Khattar tribe in Punjab, British India: "My family has long associations with Afghanistan and the Afghan Frontier; my own mother was a Tahir kheli Pathan [sic] whilst many of my own people [i.e. Khattars] have been settled there as traders and merchants since the days of the Mughal empire, carrying on an extensive trade in many goods, even as far as Balkh and Bukhara". One of the earliest District Gazeteers of the Rawalpindi and Attock districts, c.1868, also informs us that (a) many Khattars from Attock, Rawalpindi, and further down south from Bhakkhar and Muzaffargarh, both Muslims and Hindus, were very active in trade on the North-West Frontier and Afghanistan and (b) a fairly sizeable community of them of both religious persuasions had also settled in various parts of Afghanistan, too, and spoke Pushtu/Pukhtu and passed off as Afghans/Pukhtuns. Possibly, this might help explain the presence of the Khattars in Afghanistan, if there are any still there?

Im sorry, but all the evidence Ive seen so far points out to a local, indigenous Indian origins for the Khattars, and I have given a fair amount of information, references and citations from various sources. Im very sorry, too, that you felt that to justify your point of view you had to remove many of these citations/refs, which Id worked very hard on.

Also, Im sorry to say that to the best of my knowledge, there were historically never any 'Khattars' (pronounced with the hard South Asian 'T') in Europe-- and that this erroneous belief arose out of a mispronunciation of [al]'Khataar' (soft Semitic 't'), probably a Berber tribe which inhabited Andalusia at one time. If you please read the article again, carefully, youll note that I have refered to Prof Philip K Hitti on the 'Khataar's and this view is also supported by another of your Khattar elders, late Sardar Shaukat Hayat Khan (1915-1998), also cited.

If you want, I can dig up the earliest Khattar pedigrees/geneaologies as recited and old to Col. Gracroft by Mullah Sarwar, family geneaologist to Nawab (then Sardar) Muhammad Hayat Khan, as recorded in his report-- which also shows that until the 19th century, the Khattars like their kinfolk, the Ghebas, Jodhras, Janjuas, Tiwanas etc, also accepted their Rajput/Jat origins and it wasnt until much later (as posited by Prof Dr Iftikhar H Malik, also cited)that around the early or mid 20th century, a rather different account developed, due to 'political' reasons.

) It seems our respective positions are quite far apart as to the Khattar origins. What is to be done now, please?

Khani100 (talk) 13:54, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Khani100

What I would strongly suggest is, please, that if you are agreeable, in order to reconcile matters, and to arrive at some acceptable resolution, we refer this article to the editors/neutral folk, here on Wikipedia? Khani100 (talk) 13:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Khani100

Notice

Dear Wikipedia Editors, someone from an IP address, is still persistently adding unverifiable material and not responding to any requests for discussion/dispute resolution. What is to be done now, please? I am going to remove the new contentious material. Khani100 (talk) 16:28, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Khani100

If an IP user is consistently removing cited information without discussion, there are two main options. You can place a warning template on the IP user's page, and if the user continues to edit-war, an administrator may block them. The second option is requesting page protection, specifically semi-protection. Semi-protection means that for a variable length of time, the article is locked from being edited by anonymous IP users. The place to do this is WP:RPP, which includes instructions for adding a new request. JanetteDoe (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

>> I am also KHATTAR .. one thing want to mention which some of you know is "" who was SARDAR KALA KHAN"" he was the freedom hero who hit Nikalson and thought that he was dead Sardar KALA KHAN moved away and MR.Sikandar hayaad family took him to their house as they rewarded the name SIR !!!!!! Sardar sikandar is not the hero of KHATTARS but SARDAR KALA KHAN was the hero .. its about 6 km away from Taxila there is a tawr at margalla hill you can see there mention sardar KALA KHAN hit Nikalson .. don't change the history people .. its in our blood and we will transfer it ... one more thing the person is saying Khattars are from AFGANISTAN its true .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khattar229 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Indeed, Khattar229 is quite right, Sir Sikandar was son of Muhammad Hayat Khattar, he was a poor shepherd and he once helped John Nicholson an Englishman and he was rewarded by British government with jageer an nawabi title. Muhammad Hayat also had 2 sons out of marriage (illegitimate birth) these illegitimate sons were Liaquat Hayat (from a Sikh woman of Patiala), he was also given later title of 'Sir' by English on recommendation of Maharaja (king_ of Patiala state) Patiala, as he was a servant of Maharaja's singing woman called 'Shamshad begum' and he would look after Maharaja when he visited the 'kotha' (brothel) of this woman. Also annother illegitimate son was Barakat Masih, from a Christian low caste 'masih' cleaning woman of Hasan Abdal. He died in 1977. This family of Wah Hayats are Khattars and of Hindu Khatri orgins. Khatris>one big clan is Arora>and one small section of Aroras is Khattars. Thanks. 39.54.144.4 (talk) 21:19, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Mir Ali Khattar, Dhok Jhalan, near Bagnotar, disst Harepur, KPK, Pakistan

Spelling of 'Khattar' in Urdu

Excuse me please, but according to my limited knowledge the spelling of 'Khattar' in Urdu is given wrongly. Should be 'Khattar' with a hard T (as in Tiger, Urdu Ttay) not 'Khataar' with soft t (eg as in 'Italiano', Urdu te). I would pl request correction. 39.54.121.219 (talk) 03:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Dr HP Gupta

Conflicting viewpoints

• There should be no problem accepting the existence of Khattars among Muslim , Sikh and Hindu :Punjabis , Hindkowans , Pashtuns , Seraikis .
• The cloak of religion while important is not the singular element in a community's historical collective consciousness of itself and therefore Hindu/Sikh Khattar self knowledge of descent from ancestors from what are now geographically " exclusively Muslim " countries or areas does not clash with Muslim Khattars assertion of being Punjabi/Multani/Pashtun/Hindkowan/ .Its no different from the fact that Saudi Arabia had a massive population of Jews and Christians in pre-islamic times and many tribes and people of non Muslim denomination have roots in that area .
• Therefore while the information provided by editors on origin may seem conflicting , look carefully it there are are critical threads of commonality .
• Aggressive deletion of content is only indicative of

a) Arrogance of a particular editor ( really indicative of ignorance "of the other" , although there may be mastery of only his/her own known circle of sources)

b) Denial of another perspective

c) Overindulgence/misuse of Wikipedia rules to strip away the spirit of sharing knowledge

d Sheer desire to dominate discourse ( really nothing to do then with extending the borders of knowledge )

Intothefire (talk) 06:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Your continued refusal to follow WP:AGF and your continued personal attacks on other editors, have just got you a 1 week block. See my further message on your Talk page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:24, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Re reversion

Thanks User:Sitush for making the necessary reversions! However, I dont understand fully about the verification and the BLP violation please, from the Edit summary? Could you kindly help out and explain? Thanks. I really thought I was adding the names of some well-known Khattar personalities here. Khani100 (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100

No problem. There is a de facto consensus among experienced editors that caste is similar to ethnicity and religion. A consequence of this is that in the case of biographies of living people it is necessary that we provide a reliable source which verifies that the person concerned self-identifies as a member of a particular community. In the case of people who are now dead, verifiability still applies. These points can be seen in action across scores of articles relating to "List of members of caste X". The issue has also been discussed at WT:INB, where a fair few of the participants are from India or of Indian origin.

Your contribution added three names, one of whom is a living person. There were no citations to verify their ethnicity, nor were there any in the linked articles. - Sitush (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Ok, right, I thought that perhaps since their relationships to some of the existing people in the list were given these might be enough/acceptable-- I am really sorry, should have taken more care and ref to the Wikipedia gudelines before adding. Thank you very much, appreciate this note ! Khani100 (talk) 12:44, 14 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100

No need to apologise. It is an issue that trips up a fair few people. - Sitush (talk) 12:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I shall try to be more careful in future. Khani100 (talk) 02:32, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100

Removed

As per my comments on the talk pages of Sikandar Hayat Khan (Punjabi politician) and Shaukat Hayat Khan have also removed this article from my editorial watch and edit/amend list. Khani100 (talk) 19:40, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100

Copy edit & tag improvement, April 2012

I tidied up the prose just now. The whole article is unreferenced, so that is what should be tagged. Slapping a tag on each section is overdoing it and looks like it's being used as a "badge of shame". Note the disambigation needed in one section. --Stfg (talk) 13:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Dear User:Stfg, hallo. I looked at this page as I was editing main Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan page. Regarding the 'disambiguation' note, I believe one already exists for some time? It lists both Sikandar Hayat Khan (Punjabi politician) (who is one of the people listed here) and Sikandar Hayat Khan, a Kashmiri politician. In addition, if we write Sir Sikandar Hayat Khan for the person here, it redirects to his article, I have done this please. Would there be any further need to create a disambiguation page please? Im sorry to bother but am still not v familiar with Wikipedia rules and regulations and am working to learn. Many good wishes, 39.54.233.36 (talk) 06:57, 24 April 2012 (UTC)AsadUK200

Sorry, there seems to be a problem with log in today, i keep getting logged out at times, above note left by me. AsadUK200 (talk) 07:02, 24 April 2012 (UTC)AsadUK200

Hello AsadUK200. Thanks very much for resolving this. "Disambiguation needed" doesn't mean we need a disambiguation article; it means that a wikilink goes to a diambiguation page when it it would be better to make it go to a content page. By adding "Sir" you have solved the problem, so I've removed the tag. Thank you. --Stfg (talk) 09:04, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

-KHATTARS- Excuse me i am also from Khattar tribe and seems there is a problem about this page and agreement about Khattars origin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.54.92.150 (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Even Khattars are not fully agreed about this topic but my grandfather used to say Khattar tribes are Rajputs, sub caste of 'Chohan' given on Info Box of the page I also think. Some early British admin officers also gave this same family tree of famous chiefs of Hayat Family Khattars, this is also recently given on line at this site, might be helpful http://dograkahani.blogspot.com/2012/04/famous-punjabis-before-1947-part-1.html , if you kindly check thanks.Waizardon (talk) 14:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)waizardon

Khattars, list of

Hello, I have re added the name of Pakistani TV director/producer Yawar Hayat Khan to this list of Khattars as his ethnicity and family background are v clear as per the family pedigree given in the reflist of this person's article. I also think that a number of other Khattars of this famous Wah family should also be re added here thanks AsadUK200 (talk) 13:46, 7 October 2012 (UTC)AsadUK200

It will be removed. RoyalArk and other such sites, one of which is in the linked article, are not reliable sources. This has been determined by consensus at WP:RSN. - Sitush (talk) 15:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Notability

Helo, again someone is adding non notable Khattars here and also people who although notable in some sense, dont have any evidence they are Khattars. I have deleted but i hope someone here will keep an eye on this please, thanks39.54.42.228 (talk) 16:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Hilda Khan

I have readded 2 categories that help classify this tribe, please dont remove these, thanks. 39.54.131.158 (talk) 04:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Hilda Khan

Nope, there is no footnoted text in the article noting them to be Jat or Rajput. We cannot have those categories unless the article explicitly describes them as such, with clear and reliable citations. Not caste association materials, not blogs, not old Britisher imperial documents, but actual serious anthropology or social works noting them as being in those communities. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Attention dear editors, MattherwVanitas and User:Sitush, regarding previous edits and removal of material deemed controversial, someone seems to have once again added most of this. I dont know if this is a good faith edit or a vandalism attempt, as this has been repeated a number of times. I am going to once again remove this material and make it a simple article. Thanks, 39.54.177.100 (talk) 04:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Prof (r) Hilda Khan, Pakistan

Changed possible vandal edit

Hi Wikipedia editors , I have noted and changed a possible vandal edit by IP address 2.98.31.245, to the Khattar article. I shall keep an eye on this and hope that you will also please keep a check. The same problem seems to persist non-stop with most of the Pakistani articles about various tribes and races. I just dont know when they will stop. If ever. This is a continuous exercise in futility. 39.54.236.125 (talk) 08:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Prof (retd) Hilda Khan, Pakistan

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khattar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629080235/http://www.contemporarywriters.com/authors/?p=auth164 to http://www.contemporarywriters.com/authors/?p=auth164#bibliography

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Actual pedigree of Khattars as reported to Col Hall in 1860s by the family of Hayat Khan Khattar of Wah

The senior branch of the Khattar tribe (which has both Hindus and Muslims) settled in Wah, Attock area of Punjab, Pakistan, is the Wah family , and they are neither Jat nor Awan/so-called fake Arabs, nor Turks etc-- they have maintained accurate historical pedigree in the past which was recorded by Col CH Hall in 1866 probably at Wah village, seat of late Nawab Muhammad Hyat Khan Khattar, which clearly shows they are of Rajput (Chohan) descent. Hence, they should be classified properly as 'Muslim Rajputs'. I am reproducing this original pedigree below, please, for accuracy and for the record:

STARTS HERE Original Pedigree and Genealogy of the Hayat, Khattar Family of Wah, as per the Account Given to Col. CH Hall, by Mullah Sarwar, Genealogist to Sardar (later Nawab) Muhammad Hayat Khan, 1866 and duly recorded at the Residence of the Sardar, in his company, in October of that year.

1. Chauhan (or Chohan) Agnivanshi Rajput, Remote Progenitor –probably of Hun/Central Asian ancestry who came via Kashmir and settled with his clan/tribe in various parts of the areas that were later Punjab, UP and Rajputana.

   (Several generations)

2. Rai Shiv Dayal Chauhan (came from Kashmir or upper/hills of Punjab and settled at Bagh Nilab, near Indus River, c. 750 AD)

   (Several generations)

3. Rai Kishan Dayal

4. Rai Har Dayal

5. Rai Ram Dayal

6. Had two (2) sons, Rai Sukh Dayal (supposedly remote ancestor of Tiwanas, Noons etc) and Rai or Raja Jai Dayal (direct line)

7. Raja Jiwan (son of Raja Jai Dayal)

8. Raja Mahinder

9. Raja Gajinder

10. Raja Rajinder

11. Raja Harnarain

12. Raja Badrinath

13. Had two (2) sons, Raja Dayanand who via his descendant Raja/Rai Alyas, was progenitor of the Ghebas, Jodhras etc; and Raja Raghunand (direct line)

14. Raja Kaidarnath (alias ‘Kaidu Raja’ or ‘Khattar Raja’) son of Raja Raghunand, converted to Islam around 11th-12th AD, and received title of ‘KHATTAR KHAN’. All Khattars today, Muslim, Hindu and Sikh, descended from him, in Pakistan and India and elsewhere.

15. Khattar Raja/Khattar Khan had 6 sons, and they divided into two (2) groups (a) KALA SECTION (led by Kalay Khan) and (b) CHITTA SECTION or ‘FEROZAL’ SECTION (led by Feroz Khan)

16. From Chitta/Ferozal Section over the next many generations, with frequent inter-marriages and inter-relations with various Afghan, Persian and Turki (Turkish/Central Asian) settlers, was RAJA SARBULAND KHAN , who received also the title of ‘Sardar’ and was also known as ‘Sardar Sarbuland Khan’.

(From line of Sarbuland Khan)

17. Said Ahmad Khan

18. Ghazan Khan

19. Jamal Khan (founded village of ‘Jalalsar’ after his son, now ‘Wah’)

20. Jalal Khan (lived under the reign of the Mughal Emperor Jahangir)

21. Had two sons, Inayat Khan and Habeeb Khan; and from Habeeb Khan are:

22. Kamil Khan and Ghazi Khan; and from Kamil Khan:

23. Shah Wali Khan (also known as ‘Shah Wali Mansabdar’ as he was in Mughal service and enjoyed ‘Mansab’ or rank of Haft-Hazari, commander over 7000); and from him:

(3-4 generations)

24. Several sons, (a) Sardar Karam Khan (b) Hassan Khan (c) Fatteh Khan (d) Kaim Khan and (e) Noor Khan. Sardar Karam Khan was murdered by his half-brother, Fatteh Khan; and he too was later murdered by Fatteh Khan, Khattar of Dharek. The sons of late Sardar Karam Khan are as follows;

25. (a) Gulab Khan (b) Bahadur Khan (c) SARDAR MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN, ASST. COMMISSIONER (THE MAIN SUBJECT OF THIS PEDIGREE) born: 1833/34; (d) Ghulam Khan’ and (e) Sikandar Khan.

Ends Here

Subsequent Pedigree from Sardar (later Nawab) Muhammad Hayat Khan, CSI, of Wah (until 1947-48)

26. Nawab Muhammad Hayat Khan (1833/34-1901) had many children from various wives and concubines, and from his Senior Wife, Begum Zainab Khanam, daughter of Ghulam Jilani, Ansari, employee and minister of Kapurthala State, he had the following sons: (a) Nawabzada Muhammad Aslam Hayat Khan (died 1924); (b) Sardar Mahmood Hayat Khan (died 1910) (c) Khan-Bahadur (later Nawab-Bahadur) Sir Liaquat Hayat Khan, ex-Prime Minister of Patiala State, British Punjab (1887-1948) (d) Sardar Ghairat Hayat Khan (died 1911); and (e) CAPT ® SARDAR SIR SIKANDAR HAYAT KHAN, KBE, KCSI etc , former Premier of the Punjab (1892-1942)—the noblest and most distinguished of the sons of his notable father and the most brilliant of the scions of Khattar race, the true pride of all Punjabis, Hindu, Muslim or Sikh.

Many thanks, 39.54.20.130 (talk) 14:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC) Prof Dr Vimal A. Verma

Wish even what has been written by an anonymous user was corroborated by Shukat Hayat also, he himself desired Arab ancestry for his family. There's always been a controversy of Hayats are really Khattars or otherwise. God know best. Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 23:14, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Source availability

<nowiki>https://books.google.com/books?id=Ifs9AQAAQBAJ&pg=PT213<nowiki> is a broken URL or it is at least not readable in Europe due to a possible Google Books' geoblocking. That URL is the unique sourc efor the current WP article.

The link has moved to <nowiki>https://books.google.it/books?id=tHDCvQEACAAJ<nowiki> which has the same URL but no preview available.Philosopher81sp (talk) 09:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)